Arguments about the paychecks were research economists long ago started the w. Petty. The William Petty was the first in the history of the Foundation of the theory of "iron law of wages". Minimum wage theory reflects the initial development of the CNTB. At the moment, production is not yet developed, to force the workers to work, bourgeois had to rely on the State to maintain low wages. However from this argument I can see is, workers only get from his labor products the minimum living material they created. The rest have been capitalist appropriation. It is analyzed the exploitative. Arguments about Marshall's salary is the continued development of arguments about the salary of the earlier classical economists. Marxist theory of wages already outlines the nature of wages under the CNTB are cloaking-the salary is the price of labor, rejected the view of capitalist economists earlier (Ricardo). The point of the Spear on the salary is still valid to this day. Although in our country has been the salary policy reform. However, many of the core issue has not been resolved satisfactorily. So far, the income of the person being paid up, the standard of living, consumption increases, basically does not offer wages policy that due to rising incomes in addition to salary, thanks to economic growth (State salaries paid accounted for only one third of other income, amounting to two-thirds). Understanding and properly applied the principles of Marshall's salary in terms of market economy in our country today have huge implications.Salary policy reform will influence how to the benefit of workers, and the reform should proceed as to how to ensure benefit
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..