ON THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS :1 . WHE

ON THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS :

1 . WHETHER ARTICLE 12 OF THE EEC TREATY HAS DIRECT APPLICATION WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF A MEMBER STATE, IN OTHER WORDS, WHETHER NATIONALS OF SUCH A STATE CAN, ON THE BASIS OF THE ARTICLE IN QUESTION, LAY CLAIM TO INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS WHICH THE COURTS MUST PROTECT;

2 . IN THE EVENT OF AN AFFIRMATIVE REPLY, WHETHER THE APPLICATION OF AN IMPORT DUTY OF 8% TO THE IMPORT INTO THE NETHERLANDS BY THE APPLICANT IN THE MAIN ACTION OF UREAFORMALDEHYDE ORIGINATING IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY REPRESENTED AN UNLAWFUL INCREASE WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 12 OF THE EEC TREATY OR WHETHER IT WAS IN THIS CASE A REASONABLE ALTERATION OF THE DUTY APPLICABLE BEFORE 1 MARCH 1960, AN ALTERATION WHICH, ALTHOUGH AMOUNTING TO AN INCREASE FROM THE ARITHMETICAL POINT OF VIEW, IS NEVERTHELESS NOT TO BE REGARDED AS PROHIBITED UNDER THE TERMS OF ARTICLE 12;

Kết quả (Anh) 2:

ON THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:

1. Whether ARTICLE 12 OF THE EEC Treaty HAS WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF DIRECT APPLICATION A MEMBER STATE, IN OTHER WORDS, Whether Nationals OF STATE Such a CAN, ON THE BASIS OF THE ARTICLE IN QUESTION, WHICH LAY THE RIGHTS Claim INDIVIDUAL TO PROTECT MUST Courts;

2 . IN THE EVENT OF AN Affirmative REPLY, THE APPLICATION OF AN IMPORT Whether DUTY TO THE IMPORT OF 8% INTO THE NETHERLANDS BY THE MAIN ACTION IN THE Applicant OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC IN UREAFORMALDEHYDE originating REPRESENTED AN UNLAWFUL INCREASE OF GERMANY WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE 12 OF THE EEC Treaty IT WAS IN THIS OR Whether CASE A DUTY OF THE APPLICABLE sửa reasonable BEFORE 1 MARCH 1960 WHICH AN sửa, ALTHOUGH AN INCREASE FROM THE amounting to ARITHMETICAL POINT OF VIEW, IS NOT TO BE REGARDED AS Nevertheless UNDER THE TERMS prohibited OF ARTICLE 12;