Container type refers to the tempor

Container type refers to the temporary waste disposal receptacle. The variety of containers is vast, but existing classifications found in literature are characterized mainly by type, material, and size. Type includes bags or sacks, bins, containers, barrels, wheeled containers, roll-off containers, compactor containers, and drums, just to name a few (Bilitewski et al., 1997, 2010; O' Leary, 1999; Uriarte, 2008). Underground containers were investigated by ISWAWGCTT (2004), Greco et al. (2014), and Nilsson (2011); and roll-off containers by O' Leary (1999) and Rhyner et al. (1995). Container material and size is more limited. Materials largely consist of plastic and metal materials (Bilitewski et al., 1997, 2010), in addition to some paper and cardboard (Diaz et al., 2005; Tchobanoglous et al., 1993; Uriarte, 2008). Container size is usually classified as small, medium, or large (Bilitewski et al., 1997, 2010; Nilsson, 2011) but some researches identify size by volume, such as Bilitewski et al. (1997, 2010), Greco et al. (2014), and Uriarte (2008). An intuitive relation exists between container type and size; bags and containers without wheels tend to be smaller, and wheeled and underground containers tend to be larger. For example, EN 840 family of norms (CEN, 2014) classifies two-wheeled containers with a capacity up to 400 L, four-wheeled containers with flat or domed lid(s) with a capacity up to 1,300 L, and four-wheeled containers with flat lid(s) with a capacity up to 1,700 L. These norms extend container classification to also include features concerning lifting devices (CEN, 2014), including comb lifting, trunnion, dome lids, and BG© lifting devices,
with are also related to the dimensions of the container.

Of all considered container features, the most technologically relevant and innovative feature is type of container. Material features are largely limited to suitability of bags for biodegradable waste.

Kết quả (Anh) 1:

Container type refers to the temporary waste disposal receptacle. The variety of containers is vast, but existing classifications found in literature are characterized mainly by type, material, and size. Type includes bags or sacks, bins, containers, barrels, wheeled containers, roll-off containers, trash compactor containers, and drums, just to name a few (Bilitewski et al., 1997, 2010; O ' Leary, 1999; Uriarte, 2008). Underground containers were investigated by ISWAWGCTT (2004), Greco et al. (2014), and Nilsson (2011); and roll-off containers by O ' Leary (1999) and Rhyner et al. (1995). The container material and size is more limited. Materials largely consist of plastic and metal materials (Bilitewski et al., 1997), in addition to some paper and cardboard (Diaz et al., 2005; Tchobanoglous et al., 1993; Uriarte, 2008). The container size is usually classified as small, medium, or large (Bilitewski et al., 1997, 2010; Nilsson, 2011) but some researches identify size by volume, such as Bilitewski et al. (1997, 2005), Greco et al. (2014), and Uriarte (2008). An intuitive relation exists between the container type and size; bags and containers without wheels tend to be smaller, and wheeled and underground containers tend to be larger. For example, EN 840 family of norms (CEN, 2014) classifies two-wheeled containers with a capacity up to 400 L, four-wheeled containers with flat or domed lid (s) with a capacity up to 1.300 L, and four-wheeled containers with flat lid (s) with a capacity up to 1.700 L. These norms extend container classification to also include features concerning lifting devices (CEN, 2014), including the comb lifting, trunnion, dome lids, and BG © lifting devices, with are also related to the dimensions of the container. Of all considered container features, the most technologically relevant and innovative feature is the type of container. Material features are largely limited to suitability of bags for biodegradable waste.

Kết quả (Anh) 2:

Container type Refers to the temporary waste disposal receptacle. The variety of containers is vast, but existing literature Classifications are found in Characterized mainly by type, material, and size. Type includes bags or sacks, bins, containers, barrels, Wheeled containers, roll-off containers, compactor containers, and drums, just to name a few What (Bilitewski et al., 1997, 2010; O 'Leary, 1999; Uriarte, 2008 ). Underground containers investigated by ISWAWGCTT là (2004), Greco et al. (2014), and Nilsson (2011); and roll-off containers by O 'Leary (1999) and RHYNER et al. (1995). Container material and size is more limited. Materials consist largely of plastic and metal materials (Bilitewski et al., 1997, 2010), in to addition to some paper and cardboard (Diaz et al., 2005; Tchobanoglous et al., 1993; Uriarte, 2008). Container size is classified as Thường small, medium, or large (Bilitewski et al., 1997, 2010; Nilsson, 2011) but some researches diện size by volume, như Bilitewski et al. (1997, 2010), Greco et al. (2014), and Uriarte (2008). An intuitive relation container type and size giữa exists; bags and containers without wheels Tend to be smaller, and Wheeled and underground containers Tend to be larger. For example, EN 840 family of norms (CEN, 2014) classifies two-Wheeled containers with a capacity up to 400 L, four-Wheeled containers with flat or domed lid (s) with a capacity up to 1,300 L, and four-Wheeled containers with flat lid (s) with a capacity up to 1,700 containers L. These norms extend to also include features Concerning classification lifting devices (CEN, 2014), gồm comb lifting, trunnion, dome lids, and BG © lifting devices,
with are am also related to the dimensions of the container. of all container Considered features, the most technologically and the relevant type of container is Innovative feature. Material features are largely limited to bags for biodegradable waste suitability of.