Rule-based mistakes are difficult t

Rule-based mistakes are difficult to avoid and then difficult to
detect. Once the situation has been classified, the selection of the
appropriate rule is often straightforward. But what if the classification
of the situation is wrong? This is difficult to discover because
there is usually considerable evidence to support the erroneous
classification of the situation and the choice of rule. In complex
situations, the problem is too much information: information that
both supports the decision and also contradicts it. In the face of
time pressures to make a decision, it is difficult to know which
evidence to consider, which to reject. People usually decide by taking
the current situation and matching it with something that happened
earlier. Although human memory is quite good at matching
examples from the past with the present situation, this doesn’t
mean that the matching is accurate or appropriate. The matching
is biased by recency, regularity, and uniqueness. Recent events are
remembered far better than less recent ones. Frequent events
are remembered through their regularities, and unique events are
remembered because of their uniqueness. But suppose the current
event is different from all that has been experienced before: people
are still apt to find some match in memory to use as a guide. The
same powers that make us so good at dealing with the common
and the unique lead to severe error with novel events

Kết quả (Anh) 2:

Rule-based mistakes are difficult to avoid and then difficult to
detect. Once the situation bị classified, the selection of the
the appropriate rule is often Do straightforward. But what if the classification
of the situation is wrong? This is difficult to discover vì
there is Evidence to support the Thường Considerable Erroneous
classification of the situation and the choice of rules. In complex
Situations, the problem is too much information: information có
cả hỗ the Decision and am also contradicts it. In the face of
time pressures to make a Decision, it is difficult to know đó
Evidence to như mà to reject. People Thường decide by taking
the current situation and matching it with something That happened
earlier. Although human memory is quite good at matching
examples with the present from the past situation, this does not
mean is accurate or rằng the appropriate matching. The matching
is biased by recency, regularity, and uniqueness. Recent events are
far better than less recent Remembered ones. Frequent events
are Remembered through có regularities, and unique events are
Remembered vì có uniqueness. But suppose the current
event is khác được experienced all that is before: people
are still apt to find some match in memory to use as a guide. The
same powers make us so good có at dealing with the common
and the unique lead with novel events to Severe error