In contrast, The United States subm

In contrast, The United States submits that Indonesia's claim under Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement is based on a flawed analysis and insufficient evidence. The United States contends that the national treatment obligation contained in Article 2.1 is “not intended to prevent legitimate measures,such as section 907(a)(1)(A), that establish neutral product standards based on public health criteria”.

Kết quả (Anh) 1:

In contrast, The United States submits that Geelong's claim under Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement is based on a flawed analysis and insufficient evidence. The United States contends that the national treatment obligation contained in Article 2.1 is "not intended to prevent legitimate measures, such as section 907 (a) (1) (A), that establish neutral product standards based on public health criteria".

Kết quả (Anh) 2:

In contrast, the United States submits Indonesia's claim under Article có 2.1 of the TBT Agreement is based on a flawed analysis and Insufficient Evidence. The United States contends là national treatment contained in Article 2.1 Obligation is "not intended to Prevent legitimate Measures, như section 907 (a) (1) (A), that lập neutral product based on public health criteria Standards".