An audit at the two customers were implemented under the program audit of the company in the form of money and items for ABC Company and XYZ Company consist of cash and bank deposits. However due to the nature of each different customers should also differ in terms of pre-audit. This is shown in all three phases of the audit:
audit preparation phase:
- The company is customer ABC second year, so for the understanding and evaluation HTKSNB, KTV interview only changes in the field of business, management structure ... this year compared with the first year that affect the audit, interviews clients to see the recommendations of the auditors in 2008 have made the ABC company is whether and how the implementation. Through the evidence gathered KTV noticed HTKSNB of ABC Company is in effect therefore be defined materiality level of 1% compared to total assets and audit risk is low. However, due to ABC Company is a subsidiary unit of state-owned enterprises, mainly funds from the state budget, so the issue properly funded mandates are not used for improper purposes, KTV embezzling always pay attention to when auditing cash items. So when auditing cash item in company ABC KTV attention to compliance objectives.
- Conversely customer XYZ Company is the first year, so technicians must carry out the procedure to learn the company HTKSNB XYZ, KTV use questionnaires to assess HTKSNB. At the same time also contacted KTV KTV predecessor audited for XYZ Company B to collect information about the audit results in 2008. Through the evaluation of the evidence obtained, KTV judgment of Company XYZ is HTKSNB ineffective. Therefore the key is determined to be low: 0.8% of total assets and audit risk is high. Also due account XYZ Company has foreign currency bank deposits, KTV identified as a risk in the recognition of exchange rate differences.
When auditors conduct audits cash items in the implementation phase of the audit: KTV perform the prescribed procedures in the audit program templates for both ABC company and XYZ company. However due to the nature of the two customer is different, the level of implementation of testing at Company ABC and Company XYZ is different.
- At ABC Company, is rated as good HTKSNB so many KTV implementation control procedures and reducing the basic test. As for Company XYZ HTKSNB is considered less effective and is the first customer in so many KTV perform more basic test: conduct inventory KTV cash funds at the time of the audit and recalculate to check the balance on 31/12/2009.
- ABC company, cash collection and payment transactions take place much so that the sample size to check the details of this account is large. Also at XYZ Company revenue and expenditure operations mainly for deposits banks so check with your sample size is big business. Additionally at XYZ Company of collection and payment of deposits in foreign currencies related to the detailed examination should pay attention to the KTV converting foreign currencies into VND and accounting of exchange rate differences.
- Apart check out the details of the cash costs at ABC company as rewards by decision of the Group A, spent on tasks assigned to group A as expenses to train staff in the workshop, when taken to use new transformers ... the KTV to reconciliation between the actual expenditure with the tasks assigned in the decision is consistent with each other or not, the amount spent over the estimates, norms (if available ) has spread or not ...
in the end of the audit period: basically the steps of the implementation of the audit period ending in company ABC and company XYZ is the same. However, due to the Company ABC is a unit of conglomerate dependent A so as to make accounting adjustments at ABC Company, in addition to discussions with ABC Company accountants, auditors should also talk to accountants corporate governance A person is authorized to examine and monitor the accounting work at ABC company.
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..