229. We are fortified in our interp

229. We are fortified in our interpretation of Article 3.5 of the Anti-Dumping Agreementby the
interpretation we gave to Article 4.2(b) of the Agreement on Safeguards. In two recent Reports,
United States – Wheat Gluten Safeguard and United States – Lamb Safeguard, we examined the
causation requirements of the Agreement on Safeguards and, in particular, the non-attribution
language of Article 4.2(b) of that Agreement.
230. Although the text of the Agreement on Safeguardson causation is by no means identical to
that of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, there are considerable similarities between the two Agreements
as regards the non-attribution language. Under both Article 3.5 of the Anti-Dumping Agreementand
Article 4.2(b) of the Agreement on Safeguards, any injury caused to the domestic industry, at the
WT/DS184/AB/R
Page 77
same time, by factors other than imports, must not be attributed to imports. Moreover, under both
Agreements, the domestic authorities seek to ensure that a determination made concerning the
injurious effects of imports relates, in fact, to those imports and not to other factors. In these
circumstances, we agree with the Panel that adopted panel and Appellate Body reports relating to the
non-attribution language in the Agreement on Safeguardscan provide guidance in interpreting the
non-attribution language in Article 3.5 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement.

Kết quả (Anh) 1:

229. We are fortified in our interpretation of Article 3.5 of the Anti-Dumping Agreementby theinterpretation we gave to Article 4.2 (b) of the Agreement on Safeguards. In two recent Reports,United States-Wheat Gluten Safeguard and United States – Lamb Safeguard, we examined thecausation requirements of the Agreement on Safeguards and, in particular, the non-attributionlanguage of Article 4.2 (b) of that Agreement. 230. Although the text of the Agreement on Safeguardson causation is by no means identical tothat of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, there are considerable similarities between the two Agreementsas regards the non-attribution language. Under both Article 3.5 of the Anti-Dumping AgreementandArticle 4.2 (b) of the Agreement on Safeguards, any injury caused to the domestic industry, at theWT/DS184/AB/RPage 77same time, by factors other than imports, must not be attributed to imports. Moreover, under bothAgreements, the domestic authorities seek to ensure that a determination made concerning theinjurious effects of imports relates, in fact, to those imports and not to other factors. In thesecircumstances, we agree with the Panel that adopted panel and Appellate Body reports relating to thenon-attribution language in the Agreement on Safeguardscan provide guidance in consecutive interpreting thenon-attribution language in Article 3.5 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement.

Kết quả (Anh) 2:

229. We are fortified in our interpretation of Article 3.5 of the Anti-Dumping Agreementby the
interpretation chúng Gave to Article 4.2 (b) of the Agreement on Safeguards. In two recent Reports,
United States - Wheat Gluten Safeguard and United States - Lamb Safeguard, chúng examined the
causation requirements of the Agreement on Safeguards and, in Particular, the non-attribution
language of Article 4.2 (b) of có Agreement.
230. Although the text of the Agreement on causation is by no means again Safeguardson identical to
the Anti-Dumping của Agreement, there are similarities Considerable giữa two Agreements
as regards the non-attribution language. Under Article 3.5 of the Anti cả-Dumping Agreementand
Article 4.2 (b) of the Agreement on Safeguards, any injury caused to the Domestic industry, at the
WT / DS184 / AB / R
Page 77
same time, imports of coal by other Factors, phải not be attributed to imports. Moreover, under both Show
Agreements, the Domestic Authorities to Ensure seek a determination made ​​có Concerning the
injurious effects of imports relates, in fact, to imports and not to other những Factors. In These
Circumstances, We agree with the Panel and Appellate Body có Adopted panel reports relating to the
non-attribution language in the Agreement on guidance in interpreting the Safeguardscan cung
non-attribution language in Article 3.5 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement.