One is, DOF are the dominant role in the whole process of implementation of identified land use the project's money in the city; -Two is, the Department of natural resources and the environment are not the dominant role in the whole process of implementation of identified land use the project's money in the city; and only the host made the bidding phase over the network to select consultants determine the price of the land; and perform the procedure, prepare the profile serves the Council of cities, land valuation and report to the city people's Committee; -Thirdly, with the composition of the Council valuation of current city ground, no representative of the Organization had consultative function determines land prices independently; or expert on land prices independently; -Four is, no mechanism for business (the use of the land) show comments in the process of determining the price of the land, including the determination of the compensation cost of clearance to be deducted from the amount payable land use. As in the case of businesses with no land use amounts payable; land valuation Board or city does not approve record land prices of enterprises; -The year is, as a rule, the State budget expenses determine the price of land, resources and the environment should have held a public bidding through the internet to choose the unit had advisory bids the lowest price to be awarded, even consulting units only a few hundred thousand Dong tender to be awarded , to then be "exclusive" perform pinpoint land projects, and businesses must be very "miserable" because this consultant. This is a factor that leads to lack of transparency, the mechanism "for" negative and damaging to the interests of consumers, businesses, and State, in need of renovation.
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..
