Nhìn chung, điểm mạnh của nghiên cứ

Nhìn chung, điểm mạnh của nghiên cứu này là tác giả đã làm rõ những lý do gây ra quan điểm trái chiều về mối quan hệ giữa SLA research và pedagogy qua nhiều thập kỉ, chủ đề mà gây nhiều tranh cãi cho các nhà nghiên cứu. Mặc dù chưa được giải thích kĩ càng, song các niềm tin về mối quan hệ giữa SLA research và pedagogy cũng được đưa ra thành công bởi Nassaji. Anh cũng thành công đưa ra các giải pháp để giảm thiểu khoảng cách giữa mối quan hệ gây tranh cãi này. Tuy nhiên mức độ thành công và sự khó khăn khi thực hiện các solutions mà Nassaji gợi ý đã bị bỏ qua. Cuối cùng, tập trung vào đối tượng nghiên cứu là ESL và EFL teachers có nhiều kinh nghiệm là tốt, tuy nhiên câu hỏi đặt ra là liệu các trainee, người sẽ trở thành giáo viên tương lai có cùng quan điểm về mức độ hiệu quả của SLA research với những giáo viên đã dày dặn kinh nghiệm hay không.

Kết quả (Anh) 1:

Overall, the strength of this study is that the author has clarified the reasons that have caused conflicting views on the relationship between SLA research and pedagogy over many decades, a topic that has caused much controversy among researchers. . Although not thoroughly explained, the beliefs about the relationship between SLA research and pedagogy were also successfully put forth by Nassaji. He also successfully proposed solutions to minimize the gap between this controversial relationship. However, the level of success and difficulty in implementing the solutions that Nassaji suggested have been overlooked. Finally, it is good to focus on experienced ESL and EFL teachers, but the question is whether trainees who will become future teachers have the same opinion about the level of effectiveness. of SLA research with experienced teachers or not.

Kết quả (Anh) 2:

Overall, the advantage of this study lies in the author's elucidation of the reasons for decades of divergent views on the relationship between SLA research and schools of thought, a topic that has been a controversial topic among researchers. Although not well explained, Nassaji successfully proposed a belief in the relationship between SLA research and education. He also successfully proposed a solution to minimize the gap between these controversial relationships. However, the degree of success and the difficulty in implementing the solution proposed by Nassaji were overlooked. Finally, it is good to focus on experienced ESL and EFL teachers, but the question is whether future trainees who become teachers have the same views on the effectiveness of SLA research as experienced teachers.

Kết quả (Anh) 3:

Generally speaking, the advantage of this study is that the author has clarified the reasons for the opposite views on the relationship between SLA research and pedagogy for decades, which is a topic of constant debate among researchers. Although it has not been well explained, the belief about the relationship between SLA research and pedagogy has also been successfully put forward by Nassaji. He also successfully proposed a solution to reduce the gap between this controversial relationship. However, the degree of success and difficulty in implementing the solution suggested by Nassaji has been ignored. Finally, it is good to focus on the research objects of ESL and EFL teachers with rich experience, but the question is whether interns who will become future teachers have the same view on the effectiveness of SLA research as experienced teachers.