For 150 years the scientists tried to identify the solar constant, solar energy reaches the Earth. However, even in these regions for free cloud of the planet, the solar constant may not be correctly identified. The gas molecules and dust particles in the atmosphere absorb and diffuse the sunlight and prevent certain wavelengths of light from ever reaching the ground. With the advent of the satellite, however, scientists were finally able to measure the output of the Sun without being hindered by the Earth's atmosphere. Solar Max, a satellite from the aviation and Space Agency (NASA), has been measuring the Sun's output since February 1980. Although a breakdown in the control system of the satellites only limited observations of it for a few years, the satellite has to be repaired in orbit by astronauts from the space shuttle in 1984. Max's observations indicate that the solar constant is not really continuously after all. the satellite's instruments have been frequent, small changes in the energy output of the Sun, often occupy not more than 0.05 per cent of the average energy output of the Sun and lasts from several days to several weeks. Scientists believe that these fluctuations coincided with the appearance and disappearance of the large group of sunspots on the Sun's disk. Sunspots are relatively dark areas on the Sun's surface has a strong magnetic field and temperatures of about 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit cooler than the rest of the surface of the Sun. Special large fluctuations in the solar constant has coincided with signs of a large sunspot group. In the 1980s, for example, tools for Solar Max have registered rising 0.3 percent in solar energy reaching the Earth. At that point, a sunspot group that covered about 0.6 percent of the solar disk, the bigger the surface area of the Earth 20 times. long-term variations in solar constants are more difficult to identify. Although the data of Solar Max have shown a slow and steady decline of output of the Sun, some scientists have thought that aging satellite's detectors may have become less sensitive over the years, so it's wrong to point out a drop of water in the solar constant. This possibility has been rejected, however, by comparing the observed Solar Max with the data from a similar instrument works with Nimbus 7 weather satellite of NASA since 1978.
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..