As a libertarian, such as Roberto,

As a libertarian, such as Roberto, say that the cocaine business is not unfair so long as no coercion is involved and the system is a pure function of supply and demand? (Arnold, Beauchamp, & Bowie, 2009). I think the Roberto’s opinion is true, why not? Cocaine leaves are a part of Andean Latin American cultures. They are used as a gift, cooking ingredient, medical cure and chewing product in social and working environments. Cocaine growers, however, produce for more than their local market. The leaf’s refined alter ego, the white powder, has long been an international drug, ending up in Western bankers’ nostrils as well as the guerrilla warlords’ in Rwanda. (Wilkinson, Saelens, Cantwell-Corn, & Aviram, 2015). In fact, under a fairness perspective, cocaine must be treated as consumer goods purely. As we can see the history of cocaine, justice does not demand that cocaine be outlawed, but the outlawing of cocaine is a matter of justice. “Some people, especially in Latin America, think it's not really about drugs (including cocaine). It's just a subterfuge for advancing the realpolitik interests of the U.S. But by and large, that's not it. We don't want gangsters and guerrillas funded with illegal drug money terrorizing and taking over other nations. No, the fact is, America really is crazy when it comes to drugs” (Nadelmann, 2014). John Rawls’ theory of “justice as fairness”, set forth in A Theory of Justice (A Theory of Justice, 1999), draws from Kant’s definition of people as “free and equal, morally autonomous, rational agents, who are not necessarily egotist” (Pomerleau, 2015). With this definition of justice, it is not necessary to regulate consumer goods because the consumer is a person of moral autonomy and is a rational agent. So, there is no reason to goods should be regulated by a government that does not follow the law of supply and demand of the market.

Kết quả (Anh) 1:

As a libertarian, such as Roberto, say that the cocaine business is not unfair so long as no coercion is involved and the system is a pure function of supply and demand? (Arnold, Beauchamp & Bowie, 2009). I think the Roberto's opinion is true, why not? Cocaine leaves are a part of Andean Latin American cultures. They are used as a gift, cooking ingredient, medical cure and chewing product in social and working environments. Cocaine growers, however, produce for more than their local market. The leaf refined alter ego, the white powder, has long been an international drug, ending up in Western bankers ' nostrils as well as the guerrilla warlords ' in Rwanda. (Wilkinson, Saelens, Cantwell-Corn, & explained Aviram, 2015). In fact, under a fairness perspective, cocaine must be treated as consumer goods purely. As we can see the history of cocaine, justice does not demand that cocaine be outlawed, but the outlawing of cocaine is a matter of justice. "Some people, especially in Latin America, think it's not really about drugs (including cocaine). It's just a subterfuge for advancing the realpolitik interests of the U.S. But by and large, that's not it. We don't want gangsters and guerrillas funded with illegal drug money terrorizing and taking over other nations. No, the fact is, America really is crazy when it comes to drugs "(Nadelmann, 2014). Others ' theory of "justice as fairness", set forth in A Theory of Justice (A Theory of Justice, 1999), draws from Kant's definition of people as "free and equal, morally autonomous, rational agents", who are not necessarily "egotist (Pomerleau, 2015). With this definition of justice, it is not necessary to regulate consumer goods because the consumer is a person of moral autonomy and is a rational agent. So, there is no reason to goods should be regulated by a government that does not follow the law of supply and demand of the market.

Kết quả (Anh) 2:

As a libertarian, như Roberto, drunk không là cocaine business so long as no coercion unfair is Involved and the system is a function of supply and demand pure? (Arnold, Beauchamp, & Bowie, 2009). I think the Roberto's opinion is true, why not? Cocaine leaves are a part of Andean Latin American cultures. They are used as a gift, cooking ingredient, medical cure and chewing product and working in social environments. Cocaine growers, tuy nhiên, tạo có local market for more coal. The leaf's refined alter ego, the white powder, has an international dragon drug được, ending up in Western Bankers 'nostrils as well as the guerrilla warlords' in Rwanda. (Wilkinson, Saelens, Cantwell-Corn, & Aviram, 2015). In fact, under a Fairness perspective, cocaine Phải purely Treated as Consumer Goods. As the history of WE CAN see cocaine, cocaine justice does not demand có be outlawed, but the outlawing of cocaine is a matter of justice. "Some people, Especially in Latin America, think it's not really about drugs (cocaine gồm). It's just a subterfuge for advancing the realpolitik Interests of the US But by and large, that's not it. We do not want gangsters and guerrillas with illegal drug money Funded terrorizing and taking over other nations. No, the fact is, America really is crazy khi Comes to drugs "(Nadelmann, 2014). John Rawls' theory of "justice as Fairness", set forth in A Theory of Justice (A Theory of Justice, 1999), draws from Kant's definition of the People as "free and equal, morally autonomous, rational agents, who are not necessarily egotist "(Pomerleau, 2015). With this definition of justice, it is not NECESSARY to Regulate Consumer Goods consumer vì is a person of moral autonomy and is a rational agent. So, there is no reason to Method for regulated by a government requirements nên không follow the law of supply and demand of the market.

Kết quả (Anh) 3:

As a liberal, such as drunk, Roberto, cocaine business is not unfair compared to the coercion long as the participation and the system is a purely functional supply and demand? (Arnold &, Beauchamp, Bowie, 2009). I think Robert's opinion is true, why not? Cocaine leaves are part of a Latin American culture. They are used as a gift, cooking ER and her ingredient, medical products in society and working environment. Cocaine produced by growers, however, is more than the local market for them. Leaves alter refined self, white powder, with long international drug safety, ended the Western bankers nostrils "as well as" the guerrilla warlords in Rwanda. (Cantwell - Wilkinson, saelens, corn, and Aviram, 2015). In fact, the next fairness cocaine point of view, consumer must be considered as a pure commodity. As we can see the history of justice is not cocaine, cocaine is demand outlawed does not, but outlawing cocaine is an important judicial. "Some people, especially in Latin America, think that this is not really about drugs (including cocaine). This is only subterfuge to advance to solve the local interests of the realpolitik but by the United States and the big, it is not it. We do not want government funded guerrilla Mafia and illegal drugs and more than other countries with money terrorizing. No, it really is the fact that the United States is, when it is "crazy big drugs" (nadelmann, 2014). John Rolls's "justice" theory as the fairness set "in a theory (a theory of justice, 1999), a draw from Kant defined as" free and autonomous region equal, morally, rational agent, who is not necessarily egotist "(Pomerleau, 2015). With this judicial definition, it is not necessary, because the large commodity consumer consumer regulate is a person's moral autonomy and is a rational agent. So there is no reason why regulated should be made by a government that does not follow the law of supply and the demand market.