Interviewer: seventh question was: Do you think the method is different from the PP TBLT teaching anywhere else? Invite a friend!
L-C5: Can I compare TBLT with traditional teaching methods PPP. Phase teacher introduced the first implementation, followed by controlled practice exercises and the final form of the stage production of the language in the form of sentences. As for TBLT I mentioned in question number 05, the TBLT have completely different models.
Interviewer: Yes. Thank you. You have to use the teaching methods foreign language? Do you find teaching methods most? Why? Invite a friend!
L-C5: I use PPDH based tasks because the requirements of each mission is clear, in particular. Sometimes I apply PPP method
Interviewer: eighth question is: Do you think the method has the advantage TBLT, what disadvantages? Invite a friend!
L-C5: I TBLT has many advantages, unlike other methods, students are free to provide corpus. In all 3 phases are used to students all the knowledge available languages, not just practice a chosen language.
- A natural context is developed from the experiences of the students with the language personalized language and relevant to them. Hs many approaches to corpus. They get acquainted with the topic of vocabulary, the links between, the structures and different forms.
- search corpus arising from the needs of students. This demand will guide corpus of lessons, not by teachers or textbooks to, learn from tasks help students acquire language through the implementation of communication tasks like real-life communication.
- After performing each task, you will see the skills that you can perform in communicating in English. This is a communicative method whereby high students will have more time to communicate.
Interviewer: Yes. Thank you. So you see this teaching method is consistent with the characteristics of your school and your students? (Example hint: The culture, customs, motor learning, learning needs, level of HS, HS learning strategy, study habits of students ... ..) offers you!
L-C5: This method has many advantages, but in the process of teaching I do not promote due to the characteristics of the school and students. Subjects my HS nation, they have no motivation, parents, students really do not care about their children's learning. Social knowledge is limited, many themes in textbooks are not closely related to the life around them. HS no conscious sense of learning, students have no external reference textbooks, SBT they borrowed. HS boldly not studied English.
Interviewer: Yes. Thank you. The main factors that promote or limit the application of PP this teaching into context what is your province? Invite a friend!
L-C5: In my opinion, factors that limit the application of PP which is communication environment. Learning needs of students. HS ethnic. Physical facilities, teaching equipment not guarantee
Interviewer: ninth question is: Do you think other teachers in your school and you learn about the province this approach look like? (More or less? Understanding or lethargic?) Offers you!
L-C5: not understand much about this PP.
Interviewer: Question tenth: You've been trained in teaching methods yet? Knowledge of this teaching your PP obtained from any source? Invite a friend!
L-C5: I have never been trained.
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17b0c/17b0cebeebd4805c56dfff964ebcb9948b24cc3b" alt=""