The collective results of these con

The collective results of these contributions to knowledge have been
impressive. Some critics of business schools might assert, however, that only
scholars can appreciate research that is published in business journals (Dulek
& Fielden, 1992). Furthermore, critics might argue that the research is too
theoretical to be of any benefit to organizations (Showalter, 1992). However,
there is as much merit in this argument as there is in the criticism that what is
written in medical journals is of little value because laypeople cannot comprehend
it. Arguably, the purpose of scholarly publications is to stimulate
the thinking of researchers so as to lead to the discovery of knowledge
(Donaldson, 1996). Knowledge is metaphysically built, in part, by researchers
standing on the shoulders of others (McCloskey, 1983). And later, if not
sooner, knowledge accumulated by scholars in traditional disciplines of
management is applied effectively to the resolution of the challenges of business
(Donaldson & Hilmer, 1998).

Kết quả (Anh) 1:

The collective results of these contributions to knowledge have beenimpressive. Some critics of business schools might assert, however, that onlyscholars can appreciate research that is published in business journals (Dulek& Fielden, 1992). Furthermore, critics might argue that the research is tootheoretical to be of any benefit to organizations (Showalter, 1992). However,There is as much merit in this argument as there is in the criticism that what iswritten in medical journals is of little value because laypeople cannot comprehendit. Arguably, the purpose of scholarly publications is to stimulatethe thinking of researchers so as to lead to the discovery of knowledge(Donaldson, 1996). Knowledge is metaphysically built, in part, by researchersStanding on the shoulders of others (McCloskey, 1983). And later, if notsooner, the knowledge accumulated by scholars in traditional disciplines ofmanagement is applied effectively to the resolution of the challenges of business(Donaldson & Hilmer, 1998).

Kết quả (Anh) 2:

The Collective results of những Contributions to knowledge được
impressive. Critics of business Some schools might, assert, Tuy nhiên, that only
scholars can appreciate business research print journals published nằm (Dulek
& Fielden, 1992). Furthermore, Critics Argue lẽ rằng research is too
theoretical to be of any Benefit to Organizations (Showalter, 1992). Tuy nhiên,
there is merit in this argument as much as there is in the Criticism mà what is
ghi print journals is of little medical value laypeople can not comprehend vì
it. Arguably, the purpose of scholarly publications is to stimulate
the thinking of researchers compared as to lead to the discovery of knowledge
(Donaldson, 1996). Knowledge is metaphysically built, in part, by researchers
standing on the shoulders of others (McCloskey, 1983). And later, if not
Sooner, traditional knowledge accumulated by scholars printer's discipline of
management is áp effectively to the resolution of the Challenges of business
(Donaldson & Hilmer, 1998).