Vì trong quá trình xét xử, xem xét

Vì trong quá trình xét xử, xem xét chứng cứ, plaintiff đơn đã cung cấp (video) công khai trước relevant parties và Arbitration Tribunal At a hearing according to Article 25.4 (VIAC Rules of Arbitration). Tuy nhiên về defendant vẫn còn thắc mắc và nghi ngờ về tính xác thực của chữ ký. Do đó defendant có thể đưa ra yêu cầu xác thực lại chứng cứ nếu còn tồn tại nghi ngờ.

Kết quả (Anh) 1:

Because during the trial and consideration of evidence, the plaintiff provided (video) publicly before relevant parties and Arbitration Tribunal At a hearing according to Article 25.4 (VIAC Rules of Arbitration). However, the defendant still has questions and doubts about the authenticity of the signature. Therefore, the defendant can make a request to re-authenticate the evidence if doubts still exist.

Kết quả (Anh) 2:

According to Article 25.4 (VIAC Arbitration Rules), (video) was publicly submitted at the hearing of the relevant parties and the arbitration court. However, defenders still have doubts and doubts about the authenticity of the signature. Therefore, if in doubt, the defense may request a re verification of the evidence.

Kết quả (Anh) 3:

Because during the trial, the evidence was examined, plaintiff has been publicly provided (video) to the parties concerned and the arbitration court for hearing according to Article 25. VIAC Rules of Arbitrage However, regarding defenders, there are still doubts and doubts about the authenticity of signatures. Therefore, the defender can ask to re-verify the evidence if there is doubt.