I first heard about Ms Van's social insurance company this morning and my SH opinions on Social Insurance of SH as follows:
SH company has set up nearly 3 years (from 2014-2016) but no insurance for employees at all, .According to my knowledge, if we subscribe insurance for employees in 2016, they will ask the previous year why not buy insurance for employees which now hybrids buy, they will not sell. their compulsory insurance will recover from 2014 until now finished, and then they sell.
We will solve this problem as follows:
first we will pay to buy insurance in District 1, and they will ask similar Q7 insurance. we will answer:
from 2014 my boss did not buy insurance for employees because the company we do not have full-time staff, as employees work only temporarily (1-2 months), no stable staff should we not be able to buy insurance. To date, human resources were sufficient, then we decided to buy insurance for employees
to make sure they will catch arrears from 2014 to the present of all employees, but we will do the lowest level of arrears by:
Explain and ask them only arrears of social insurance premiums of a person.
2014: insurance premiums are the lowest of 1 2.600.000d
2015:
we will take this number to apply
(school this is no longer the workaround, because the principle they must be collected after the sale contracted sure they will recover more extremely rare, if we know how it will reduce the legal risk is the maximum). This is the law of insurance
That's my opinion, and is waiting for your comments to apply,
If you have any order, I will explain further.
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..