Asian countries, the source of "exp

Asian countries, the source of "exporting" the most of students to the Western countries, is now pouring money into the universities in their own country to avoid the risk of brain drain. As China was spending to 0.5% of GDP on higher education, and is expected to increase this number up to 4%, higher than both the US and the UK was 1.1% 2.7%. Earlier this year, Malaysia also announced a plan to become an international center of education with 100,000 new international students, double the current figures, in 2010. According to the information given, wealth is the most important factor to promote the development of education, with evidence that the most developed countries in the world are investing money in education. On the other hand, a recent study to examine the impact of education to economic growth of provinces / cities in Vietnam through a measure of the level of education of the labor force, which is "the average of schooling years". The regression results show that "the average of schooling years" of the labor force in the light impact positively on GDP and GDP / labor. The estimated coefficient changes by 0.10 to 0.14 against 0.10 to 0.16 of GDP or GDP / employment implying that if all other factors remain unchanged, the increase 1 % of the average years of schooling would make GDP increased by 0.10 to 0.14% / year or GDP / employment increased by 0.10 to 0.16% / year. In Vietnam, the average education level of the workforce in most of the provinces ranged from 5 to 9 years in the 2000-2006 period, so when "the average schooling years" shall increase by 1 year predictable income increased by 1.5 to 2.7% country / year. This research shows that education contributes directly to economic development, which produces wealth profusely. Because of the importance of these two factors, and the connections between them, I have conducted research, specifically, this paper studies the relationship between the wealth and the demand for education using references from the Internet, and coming to the conclusion for the question, “What is more important, A or

Kết quả (Anh) 1:

Asian countries, the source of "exporting" the most of students to the Western countries, is now pouring money into the universities in their own country to avoid the risk of brain drain. As China was spending to 0.5 percent of ITS GDP on higher education, and is expected to increase this number up to 4%, higher than both the US and the UK was 1.1% 2.7%. Earlier this year, Malaysia also announced a plan to become an international center of education with 100.000 new international students, double the current figures, in 2010. According to the information given, wealth is the most important factor to promote the development of education, with evidence that the most developed countries in the world are investing money in education. On the other hand, a recent study to examine the impact of education to economic growth of provinces/cities in Vietnam through a measure of the level of education of the labor force, which is "the average of schooling years". The regression results show that "the average of schooling years" of the labor force in the light impact positively on GDP and GDP/labor. The estimated coefficient changes by 0.10 to 0.14 to 0.16 0.10 against of GDP or PER CAPITA GDP/employment implying that if all other factors remain unchanged, the increase of 1% of the average years of schooling would make GDP increased by 0.10 to 0.14%/year or PER CAPITA GDP/employment increased by 0.10 to 0.16% per year. In Vietnam, the average education level of the workforce in most of the provinces ranged from 5 to 9 years in the 2000-2006 period, so when "the average schooling years" shall increase by 1 year predictable income increased by 1.5 to 2.7% country/year. This research shows that education contributes directly to economic development, which produces wealth profusely. Because of the importance of these two factors, and the connections between them, I have conducted research, specifically, this paper studies the relationship between the wealth and the demand for education using references from the Internet, and coming to the conclusion for the question, "What is more important, or

Kết quả (Anh) 2:

Asian Countries, the source of "exporting" The most of Students to the Western Countries, is now pouring money vào trong Universities country to avoid the risk own brain drain of. As China was spending to 0.5% of GDP on Higher Education, and is expected to number up to this tăng 4%, coal Higher cả the US and the UK was 1.1% 2.7%. Earlier this year, Malaysia announced a plan to trở am also an international center of education with 100,000 new International Students, double the current figures, printed 2010. theo information given, wealth is the Most Important Factor to Promote the development of education, with Evidence Developed là nhất Investing Countries in the world are printing money education. On the other hand, a recent study Examine the impact of education to the Economic Growth of Provinces / cities in Vietnam through a measure of the level of education of the Labor force, mà "the average years of schooling." The regression results show mà "the average years of schooling" of the Labor force in the light impact positively on GDP and GDP / Labor. The Estimated coefficient changes by 0:10 to 0:14 0:10 to 0:16 of GDP với or GDP / employment if all other mà implying Factors Remain unchanged, the tăng 1% of the average years of schooling would make GDP Increased by 12:10 to 12:14% / year or GDP / 0:10 to 0:16 by employment Increased% / year. In Vietnam, the average education level of the workforce print nhất of the tỉnh ranged from 5 to 9 years in the 2000-2006 period, compared When "the average schooling years" shall only predictable income tăng Increased by 1 year to 2.7% by country 1.5 / year. This research shows mà education contributes to Economic Development trực mà produces wealth profusely. Because of the Importance of These two Factors, and the connections giữa add, I have Conducted research, specifically, this paper studies the relationship the between the wealth and the demand for education using references from the Internet, and coming to the Conclusion for the question, "What is more important,, A or