The documentary asserts that in eve

The documentary asserts that in every decade since World War II, the American public was misled so that the government (incumbent Administration ) could take them to war and fuel the military-industrial economy maintaining American political dominance in the world. Ảnh hưởng càng ngày càng tăng của ngành công nghiệp quân sự và quân phiệt trong đời sống Mỹ khi tổng thống Bush tuyên bố chúng ta đang có chiến tranh với lực lượng khủng bố . On another it tells of the increasing complicity of government and congress in allowing this industry to control and shape national policies. Although America kept no large standing army until the advent of WW II, they now always maintain as a matter of course an inconceivably vast military. As they point out in the film, over half of the money spent by Congress is on the military (some doubting this will look up the budget approved by the Congress each year and see that military spending takes up usually between 28% and 35% of the annual budget, but this ignores discretionary spending, almost all of which goes to the military, and which is the reason why we spend more on the military than all other programs combined). Và bây giờ ta cũng có thể nhìn thấy rằng : the Bush people have wrongly estimated how much militarism the general population will tolerate, but this is apt to cause merely a temporary lull, not a permanent retreat from attempting military solutions to political situations. The most upsetting part of the film deals with the complicity of Congress in tolerating this situation. While their elected representatives ought to be leading the movement to reduce the size and influence of the military in our lives, they are in fact protecting it. The film deals with weapons systems that intentionally have parts built in every state, so that representatives from every state will support them in order to protect the jobs the contracts bring.

Kết quả (Anh) 1:

The documentary asserts that in every decade since World War II, the American public was misled over that the government (incumbent Administration) could take them to war and fuel the military-industrial economy maintaining American political dominance in the world. Increasing influence of military industry and militarism in American life when President Bush announced we are at war with terrorist forces. On another it tells of the increasing complicity of government and congress in allowing this industry to control and shape national policies. Although America kept no large standing army until the advent of WW II, they now always maintain as a matter of course an inconceivably vast military. As they point out in the film, over half of the money spent by Congress is on the military (some doubting this will look up the budget approved by the Congress each year and see that military spending takes up usually between 28% and 35% of the annual budget, but this ignores discretionary spending, almost all of which goes to the military , and which is the reason why we spend more on the military than all other programs combined). And now we can also see that the Bush people have wrongly estimated how much militarism the general will tolerate, but this is apt to cause merely a temporary lull, not a permanent retreat from attempting military solutions to political situations. The most upsetting part of the film deals with the complicity of Congress in tolerating this situation. While their elected representatives from ought to be leading the movement to reduce the size and influence of the military in our lives, they are in fact protecting it. The film deals with weapons systems that intentionally have parts built in every state, so that representatives from from every state will support them in order to protect the jobs the contracts bring.

Kết quả (Anh) 2:

The documentary asserts in every decade since World có War II, the American public was misled over là government requirements (incumbent Administration) could take the fuel added to war and military-industrial American Political Economy Maintaining dominance in the world. Increasing influence of military industry and the military in American life when President Bush declared that we are at war with the forces of terrorism. On another it Tells of the complicity of government requirements and congress tăng in either, allowing this industry to control and shape national policies. Although no large standing army America kept off until the advent of WW II, chúng now as a matter of always Maintain an inconceivably vast military course. As They point out in the film, over half of the money spent by Congress is on the military (some doubting this sẽ look up the budget approved by the Congress each year and see có military spending takes up the between 28% and 35 Thường% of the Annual budget, but this ignores discretionary spending, almost all of mà goes to the military, and the reason mà Why We Spend more coal on the military all other programs combined). And now we can also see that the Bush People have wrongly Estimated how much the general population militarism sẽ tolerate, this is apt to cause, but merely a temporary lull, not a permanent retreat from military solutions to Political Situations thử. The most upsetting part of the film deals with the complicity of Congress in tolerating this situation. Khi có elected Representatives ought to be leading the movement to Reduce the size and Influence of the military in our lives, in fact vệ chúng it. The film deals with weapons systems have parts có intentionally built in every state, every state compared sẽ có Representatives from added support protect the jobs in order to bring the Contracts.