because - Firstly, the authenticity, directness of the damage and the predictiveness of the damage are not one. For example, it is clear that the Unidroit Code has two separate laws of these two properties, Article 7.4.3 and 7.4.4; - Secondly, although predictive fromtness can infer the authenticity of damage as is the case with the CISG12 Convention, it is necessary to infer otherwise that direct, authentic and predictable words need to be further explained. Although if the damage is actual or direct, the damage must have a cause-and-effect relationship with the breach of contract. However, since the damage has a cause-and-effect relationship, it is unpredictable. Because not all damages have a cause-and-effect relationship that the violator can predict in advance.- Thirdly, some countries in the world for example such as France do not limit the amount of damages compensated within the predicted range. As such, authenticity does not necessarily have to go with predictiveness.
đang được dịch, vui lòng đợi..
